August 28 2017

Ontario Court Finds Insurance Company Must Pay Plaintiff’s Legal Costs on Full Indemnity Scale

Close up of rusty locked black gate bars with distant light seen through a tunnel

An Ontario Court recently released the Hoang v Personal Insurance Co. decision on legal costs against insurance companies that have wrongfully denied a claim. The Court noted that it is typical for courts to award legal costs to the successful party on a partial indemnity basis- that is in the range of 40-60% of one’s legal fees. But the Court here determined that the unique nature of an insurance policy suggests that successful plaintiff’s should be better compensated when fighting the wrongful denial of their insurance benefits:

 One purchases an insurance policy for coverage in the event of liability, and it is the premium payable under the policy that is the cost of that coverage. Insurance companies are by their nature constantly involved in litigation, and it would be unfair and burdensome to make their customers pay a premium plus legal fees in order to obtain the coverage they bought. The premium is presumed to reflect the insurance company’s risk. If it chooses to attempt to reduce that risk by engaging in litigation over its obligation to provide coverage it should be made to fully compensate the successful party if it loses.

 The Court thereby awarded the plaintiff full indemnity of their legal costs. As an office that assists many people through their struggle to access their insurance benefits, we certainly support the Court’s reasoning.

 

Image via Flickr: Denied by Jonathan Melhuish under Creative Commons Licence

Related News

Backlit person wearing a toque sits at a table typing on a laptop, mug beside them
Long term employees are entitled to longer notice periods

Employees in Ontario are entitled notice of the termination or pay in lieu if they are terminated without cause. The notice period may be set out in a contract, but employees can be entitled to ...

Close up of bright pink and white capsules, out-of-focus needle in background on a black surface
Addiction in the workplace: Accommodation or termination?

There has been a consensus among Ontario arbitrators that where a worker’s misconduct is connected directly to a disability such as addiction, then termination is not appropriate and the employer ...

Colourful wall with a sign saying Welcome
Welcome, Samarah!

Jewitt McLuckie is proud to announce that University of Ottawa Law Student Samarah Arafat will be joining us for the 2021-2022 articling term. Samarah’s background includes research into ...