October 16 2025

Court proceeding around sexual violence

Jewitt McLuckie is proud of Jeff Meleras who obtained an important victory for his client when faced with a motion to strike their lawsuit.

In Locke v Ontario Police Services et al, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiff’s statement of claim that alleges that, in 1999, the plaintiff reported sexual assaults that she had been subject to as a 12-year-old and that the police’s determination that she had consented to the sexual activity constituted malfeasance in public office. The defendants argued that the claim should be struck because it was launched too late and because the lawsuit did not set out facts that can support a claim of malfeasance of public office.

The Ontario Superior Court found that the plaintiff’s claim was not launched too late and that the plaintiff’s lawsuit was proper such that it can proceed. The Court further commented that the notion that the plaintiff could have consented to the sexual assault as a minor fell within the realm of misfeasance, and that to not lay a charge on this basis is a blatant disregard of the law of sexual assault and the Criminal Code.

Related News

Jewitt McLuckie & Associates joins the Lawyers Feed The Hungry program

In April, Jewitt McLuckie & Associates  had the opportunity to join another area firm, SGM, as part of the Lawyers Feed The Hungry program, an initiative put together by the Law Society in ...

Join JM&A at the Halifax Labour Law Conference, Sept 30th – Oct 2nd, 2014

Samantha Lamb will be in Halifax for two days providing the Union Counsel perspective on a variety of issues.  On September 30th, join her for an interactive all day workshop: Investigating ...

Know your rights: When do an employer’s actions constitute “family status” discrimination?

It may be news to many workers that the Ontario Human Rights Code (the “Code”) protects against discrimination based on family status. “Family Status” is defined in the Code as “the status of ...